Linsey Dawn Mckensie Planetsuzy

Staba behind this madness exacerbated. This subject was thinking at the viewer, or rather, did ramble on about what could happen, who could tral atrocity sinner. The point is that in later projects, this beautiful quality went to hell and most outrageous, unbelievable situations and lengthening with fanciful events. Look at the teaser poster for Saw V (is on the fifth installment and hope, at least, another one).

And always, in these cases, I propose to analyze the same example: Carpenter's Halloween as opposed to the remake of Rob Zombie. In the classic 78 does not know anything about Myers, absolutely nothing, and that uncertainty, the ignorance of the film, the psychology of the murderer hac

Difference Between Flip Ultrahd Or Minohd Shyamalan's The Happening, cojonudas ideas ... but missed

We can not have doubts whether there are directors commented that they are loved or hated in equal measure. I often put this example to David Lynch, but it could also be the case with the charge of carrying the big screen movie that we have a discussion, criticism or review. The truth is that M. Night Shyamalan is a director creates a modern vision a little particular about terror. Undeniably, his skills and talent to move when the natural elements of everyday life into the world of film and explain it in an atmosphere of terror, tension, or as we like to call it, but I think would be better encompassed in suspense, in my humble opinion the correct term to define his films. I que the mainstay of all the works of Indian director revolves around the unknown, the fear we have for the inexplicable things that happen around us. In El Bosque was clear this feature, but equally in Signs, Lady in the Water, The Sixth Sense, etc. A halo of uncertainty running through the frames feature of this particular man, where apparently the man was not in control of things, of what was happening and it showed the audience a concern far from being resolved in the short term.

Incident is on these paths, but unlike in his previous projects, it is wrong way to describe it. Princimainly by the poor performance of the film division, headed by Mark Whalberg incomprehensible. Might not see on the screen a series of events rarely seen (in fact what happens is material) and the action of the scratch players at such low levels, with scenes so impressive that you can see, but not catastrophic power. These are the claims of Shyamalan, make a doomsday thriller, naturalist, but is unsuccessful. The narrative form of telling the story is related to their ideas, but this time, is poorly resolved at run-streets and not enough time to establish a link between meaning and the viewer (the end is unbelievable) , but still supports or sustains the baton of power to the natureOnce the movie begins, but also when it ends and suggests our absolute lack of control to something so exaggerated as to the nature and the environment. The music, by the great James Newton Howard is good, as usual, but also spends more unnoticed. It seems the common denominator is an acceptable movie, but come down in each of its facets, in all, when compared with the previous ones, and this is inevitable. Here is his message more clear during the viewing of the film, but the performance of the cast and some roads shown to tell the story make you walk away from the mastery of his other works. A real shame because he has missed very few ideas, but that m